I just watched Thrive and it was a good overview of the problem and some possible solutions. Without a few additions, however, the kind of world view it advocates doesn’t guarantee a positive outcome, since it could just as easily divert onto an alien takeover scenario in the end. But it’s a good start.
To be complete, this vid (or at least the website) would have to get into the following areas:
If those matters are added to what was stated in “Thrive” then we’d have the proper foundation to secure a positive future. Otherwise, as I always say, it could become a road to hell paved with good intentions.
I know from my research into the alien disinformation campaign, that one of the deception lines on the table is to do away with the current corrupt elite and use their demise as a springboard for an even worse alien world order.
All we have to do, then, is indeed do away with the corrupt system we have now, thus the solutions offered in “Thrive” are in the right direction, but when we get to the point of alien contact, to be very careful about their intentions and the long-term consequences of agreements we make regarding them.» read more...
This Research Note is for those who need clarification regarding my position on the historical existence of Jesus Christ, since I mention Christ quite a bit in my Gnosis articles.
Did Jesus actually exist? Common answers include:
A) Yes, he was everything the Bible says he was. Jesus was God’s only begotten Son, whom the Lord sent to die for our sins.
B) Yes, but he was just an ordinary man, at most the leader of a Jewish rebellion against Roman authorities.
» read more...
C) No, Jesus was a complete fabrication assembled from various pagan sun-god myths of the time.
With 2010-2011 seeing the rise of Wikileaks, Anonymous, Arab Spring, and Occupy Wall Street movements, it seems the “bad guys” are facing growing resistance. It seems they might finally be going down, and a new system of fairness, justice, freedom, and democracy is on the horizon… Wait, maybe it’s not that easy. There are some important things to keep in mind, discussed below.
I see these protest movements as a further advancement of the polarization phenomenon. Polarization means the undecided, apathetic, indifferent separate out into opposing extremes. Light gets brighter, dark gets darker; smart get smarter, dumb get dumber. As time goes on, it gets harder to stay on the fence. What we are seeing now is just the beginning.
At the mainstream level, the polarization phenomenon is still in its infancy. The divisive issues are limited to mundane political, financial, and environmental ones and the response has largely been symbolic. It’s a good start but still in its fragile infancy.
These political and financial catalysts will escalate up to a point, perhaps economic and social collapse, armed revolution, and World War III. But as big as those may seem, these issues will eventually be displaced by even bigger ones. They will give way to an entirely new species of catalysts belonging to a completely different paradigm.
For instance, currently the protesting public are fighting over strictly 3D Matrix Control System issues. Sooner or later these will be made obsolete when the alien issue rises to the forefront. What does it matter that you lost your home, when you’re about to lose your whole damn planet? The alien catalyst will skip the question of whether they exist and go right to how to handle them and whom to align with once they do show up. This catalyst will be far more divisive than the current political ones.» read more...
In Roland Emmerich’s film 2012, “mutant neutrinos” were responsible for destabilizing the planet. Initially I found such a plot device hilarious, but as it turns out, such a mechanism may be grounded in truth.
Consider the following news items:
Two Suns? Twin Stars Could Be Visible From Earth By 2012.
The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements.
Why is this important? 80% of earth’s core and mantle heat comes from radioactive decay. Radioactive decay rates are affected by neutrinos. Supernovas release 99% of their energy as neutrinos.» read more...
After ten months of observation back in 2004, I concluded that moon phases and periods of hyperdimensional attack are highly correlated, enough so that one can predict them.
They tend to occur within three days of a full moon, three days of a new moon, and within one day of lunar perigee or apogee. Based on this, it sounds like the entire calendar would be filled, but that is not so because each has different intensity, and the intensity varies within the active period. For example, the third day prior and after a full moon is more conducive to trouble than the others; perigee and apogee do more to amplify these.
One thing I can say for certain is that all days free of lunar influence are also free of hyperdimensional/psychic attacks. Several months ago after figuring out this pattern I tested the theory by making predictions. Success rate in predicting lunar-free days as being “good” days has been 100%. Success rate in predicting that lunar-influence days correlate with attacks has been about 90%.
What do I mean by “hyperdimensional attack”? First let me say that ‘attack’ isn’t the best word since it implies victimization. Better words would be “testing” or “challenge” or “initiation” — but these can be euphemistic considering the source and intent of these “greetings” are to put targets out of commission or worse, weaken and inevitably replace/reprogram their souls into service to STS forces.
But as far as this research note is concerned, the term “hyperdimensional attack” refers to cunning operations by negative fourth/fifth density entities to pre-emptively sabotage spiritually progressive individuals and groups in 3D. This is done by attacking the weakest persons at the weakest spots at their weakest moments. These forces have at their disposal limited time travel capability, the ability to abduct and hypnotically program key individuals for later triggering, and are by nature able to foresee our future probability vectors and analyze where the necessary critical points are located.» read more...
[please see the update below.]
Back in January 2009, I looked into correlations between planetary positions and flu pandemics. See my previous research note for an explanation of how I correctly predicted the flu pandemic for Fall/Winter 2009.
Another thing I checked was correlation between planetary positions and solar activity like sunspots and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). It quickly became clear that Jupiter and Saturn were the main players, with Uranus and Earth providing a lesser role.
According to David W. Allan, it’s not the mass of the planets so much as their magnetic fields that determines solar activity. This makes perfect sense when you look at the data. His other article goes into greater detail.
To accurately predict solar activity, one would need to model the magnetic field of the main planetary contributors and how these fields combine within the sun. I don’t have the data to make such a model, but I can still look at a solar system simulator and see what planets are where, whether their north magnetic poles are angled toward or away from the sun, and determine a window of time in which solar activity ought to be heightened.» read more...
As you may know, consciousness influences reality by affecting the probability of events. It does so at the quantum level. Based on my observation and experimentation, the basic principles are as follows: 1) Awareness and anticipation repel. 2) Ignorance and denial allow. 3) Intent and emotional resonance attract.
Here I want to focus on the third one, the attraction mode, and explain it in the simplest and clearest way. It boils down to one rule: Like begets like. In other words, the mental and emotional state that you hold in the present, attracts future events that engender more of the same.» read more...
Officially, tuning forks were invented in 1711 by John Shore, a British Musician. Unofficially, their existence traces back to ancient Celtic and Egyptian times.
Nowadays they are used mainly for testing hearing, tuning musical, keeping time in a quartz watch, and teaching the principles of vibration and resonance in the classroom. The alternative health community uses tuning forks for healing purposes.
But what did the ancients use them for? I believe they were mainly used to cut, drill, and levitate stones. I will provide some information in this note regarding these applications.
First consider this photo of the Abernethy Pictish Stone in Perthshire, Scotland:
» read more...
Overview of some trends indicating what’s ahead, and a short discussion on survivalism.» read more...
Carl Calleman claims the Mayan end date is October 28, 2011. Everyone else says it’s December 21, 2012. This has caused some confusion. So who is right? I looked into the arguments for both dates in order to get to the bottom of the issue.
Bottom line is that the Mayans had two concepts of time, a linear time recorded by the Long Count calendar, and cyclical or synchronistic time delineated by the Tzolkin and Haab calendars.
On 12/21/2012 the linear time calendar comes to an end, like a car odometer turning over after having passed 999,999 miles. But just as nothing special happens on the road when the odometer flips, so should nothing happen when the Long Count calendar flips back to its starting value. This is what Calleman believes, that the Long Count has no bearing on human experience and neither does its ending date. He does not dispute that 12/21/2012 is the end date of the Mayan Long Count, he only disputes the meaning people have given that date. So yes, the Mayan Calendar does end in 2012.
But they also had other calendars that don’t end on that date. The Tzolkin and Haab calendars describe cyclical patterns in human experience, patterns in what days or historical periods have certain synchronistic qualities, and therefore any meaningful end date ought to be based on those cycles. A calendar based on these synchronistic cycles will correlate with history, and thus its end point will be historically significant and reflect over into something we will experience.
Problem is that the Tzolkin ends every 260 days, and Haab every 365 days. Even their combination makes for a cycle that ends and repeats every 52 years, which is too short for its end date to be meaningful. Also, neither the beginning nor end of the Haab and Tzolkin match with the beginning or end of the Long Count.» read more...