(I am not willing to debate or discuss this issue any further,
as this
page should suffice for those with eyes to see. I do
this solely as a service for those
who wish to know.)
Dear Reader, You can see by the warning about me on cassiopaea.org that events have taken a very dark and unfortunate turn. This came about through a cascading series of misunderstandings that have led to a falling out between me and certain members of the Quantum Future School, particularly Laura Knight Jadczyk. I'm not angry at her or anyone in the group, just devastated that synchronistic circumstances forced this unfortunate outcome despite my best intentions to prevent it. While originally starting out as a discussion of their perceived flaws in my character, the way I conduct my personal life, methodology of reasoning, ideology, and website content, this situation has now devolved into hysteria and paranoia on their part. A few of the points they brought up were based on observations that I agreed were accurate, while most were blatant misperceptions. My attempt to clarify the latter were perceived as attacks upon their integrity, that I was rejecting everything they were trying to help me see. This is when the problems began because anything I said from that point onward, or anything I had ever said or done before, were interpreted in a biased manner that only confirmed for them their misperceptions. They bought a one way ticket to irrational behavior and all my efforts to prevent this from escalating only made it worse. I have met these individuals in person and know them to be good, kind-hearted, noble, and astute people. But sometimes our greatest strengths can be our greatest weaknesses. For example, the same quality that allows Laura to passionately defend truth against lies also makes her prone to defending her misjudgments against all reason. The same quality that allow her to identify and root out disinformation also makes her sometimes prone to suspecting and discounting new information. The same quality that allows her to throw out false ideas also makes her prone to throwing out the baby with the bathwater. In my observation, these individuals have lately become just as critical of things they have yet to learn, as of things they've learned are false. There is an important distinction here, because it is only disinformation agents who purposely seek to propagate false information. Those who place an absolute value around both false information and new information may confuse the two, and this is fundamentally why they mistake me as a disinformation agent. My website is partly an extension of a limited number of topics found on cassiopaea.org. And because it's an extension, it will naturally include some ideas not found there, ones that come from my further research into a particular topic. Because of their confusion between disinformation and new information, I am now unfortunately at the receiving end of character assassination. They have positive intentions to protect truth and dispell lies, but in this case they simply picked the wrong target. Laura has been sensitized by her experience with the genuine disinformation artist Vincent Bridges and other individuals whom she once trusted but later turned against her. The sensitive, accurate, and profound nature of the Cassiopaean material makes her a prime target by negative forces who seek to suppress or corrupt such truths. In fact, some of these forces are so clever that they can electromagnetically bias one's thoughts and emotions, artificially engineer synchronicities to confirm these misperceptions, and insert agent provocateurs to fan the flames - all in an effort to divide and conquer truthseekers by getting them to turn against each other. Laura has excellent pattern recognition skills, as do most members in the school, but with limited and skewed data such skills become useless because they only confirm a false conclusion. The difference between my method of reasoning and lately theirs, is that I primarily look for holes and contradictions while they look for reasons why they're right. As I've said in my "Truth Analysis" article, a thousand "facts" can seemingly prove a lie, but it takes only one fact can disprove a thousand lies. They can justify their biases with a thousand "dirty" things they may dig up or make up about me, but in truth such things can be interpreted in multiple ways and they seek only to interpret them in ways that confirm their suspicions. Ideally, I think they would like me to take off all the links on my site that mention Cassiopaea so that those who have targeted them by accusing them of being a crazy cult (which I guarantee is a false accusation) may not use my site as potential ammunition. Over the past several months, ______, ______, and _______ - none I have much respect for anymore - have emailed me demanding I remove my links to Cassiopaea. I rebuffed all of them because I'll let no one bully me into compromising my principles or what I believe to be the truth. So it's ironic that where they have failed, Laura might succeed if she does request I remove my links to Cassiopaea. What's occurring is a clever ploy by certain hyperdimensional forces to destroy me, Laura, Ark, the QFS, and ultimately discredit the Cassiopaean material. They fail to see the contradictions in their own reasoning, the hypocrisy in their behavior, and that they are doing the very things they're accusing me of doing. Regardless of whether I am guilty of those accusations or not, the fact that they ignore their own faults and instead project them onto me makes this situation ultra dangerous because it is their ignorance on the matter that allows negative forces to go through the back door while they're all focused on the patsy in front. I hope that they wake up and realize they haven't outsmarted 4D STS either. I'll be learning my lessons and reflecting on the valid things they have told me so far, improving and solidifying my website and continuing to provide ground breaking research, but I won't engage in a back-and-forth shouting match because this message is all I need to say on the matter - anything more would be a distraction and unfair to readers who come here to learn something instead of being caught in the cross fire. At present, there exists a needless but unavoidable rift between montalk.net and cassiopaea.org - I pray that this is temporary, but while it lasts, you don't have to choose sides. No one source has all knowledge, and in my view both our sites contain pieces to the puzzle. I wish them the best of luck in succeeding with their mission.=========== Recently someone emailed me asking what specifically the QFS were complaining about. Well, the core complaints kept changing in response to what new things they could dig up or make up. It seems to have started with a general resentment against my presence and style on the board. Then any issue, no matter how petty, became an outlet through which to vent and rationalize their covert hostility. By the end, they were going so far as to analyze my song lyrics to show how sick I was in the head, and that because of some gun/militia article I wrote years ago, they would be persecuted Waco-style if I had any connection with them. They were irrational, hysterical, and overreactive...two days into the final blowup, they put their disclaimer on the top of the front page saying "montalk.net: Warning! Disinformation Site!!" and kept it up for several months. Not even Vincent Bridges got that level of treatment. A list of the various issues that came up:
* that my listing traits of OPs and endorsing practical use of this knowledge was reckless...all of which were based on false assumptions, skewed perceptions, things taken out of context, etc... The most legitimate accusation they had concerned my being too enthusiastic about the OP subject. Once I made a mistake suggesting someone might have been a matrix agent who ended up not being one. But whereas I regretted this, apologized, and corrected my methods, the Cass leadership continues labeling others left and right, and out of ego never recants their judgments. I realized that 4D STS can use artificial synchronicities and abduction plus programming to give the hasty mind false impressions about others. While the Cass folks further said I could not outsmart 4D STS and was being used by them, they somehow excluded themselves from facing the same risk. Many of these accusations were hypocritical, more reflective of their shadow side which they were projecting onto me. For instance, they regularly label members of their own discussion group as agents, robots, or organic portals. In fact, the final rift started when after I was invited to the moderator discussion group, they asked me to give a complete analysis of a certain suspicious member. I said that based on the characteristics, chances are they were heavily programmed or even robotic. Laura enthusiastically agreed and suggested I post it to the main QFS board... and as soon as I did, that very night Laura writes a long post about how she couldn't sleep because "there went Tom again, labeling people" -- and that unleashed all the bitterness and resentment from others, ten accusations for every one I had time to correct. It was a setup, but catalysts for change must happen somehow. The disclaimer that stayed up for eight months, three of those on the front page:
* that I was using the OP stuff to label people and encourage aggressive separatism
* that my girlfriend was an organic portal sent to destroy me
* (when that didn't work) that my girlfriend was a reanimated agent sent to destroy them
* (when that didn't work either) that I was a programmed agent sent to destroy them
* that my analysis of the Second Amendment meant I was a militia nut
* that I was advocating ordinary folks be given access to nuclear weapons
* that I wanted to change the world through violent revolution by the elite
* that my association with them would bring about their Waco-style persecution
* that my satirical song lyrics somehow seriously reflected my intent and true being
* that I was posing myself as a teacher, and that I was unqualified to be one
* that my rapid-prototyping method of research (true until reason to doubt) was dangerous
* that all my physics musings were "pseudo-scientific word salad"
* that you are not qualified to say you have a soul, despite my opinion to the contrary
* that I was just a hot-blooded gunslinger "given to the follies of youth"
* that my older articles were still representative of my mindset after years of growth and learning
* that I was heartless and bigoted, imbalanced, irrational, programmed, and a threat.
Concerning the second amendment article, its basis was upon US law which states that the unorganized militia consists of all able bodied men between ages 17 and 45 in America. ---- TITLE 10 , Subtitle A , PART I , CHAPTER 13 , Sec. 311. Militia: composition and class STATUTE (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are - (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of National Guard or the Naval Militia. ---- The unorganized militia means practically everybody, the public at large. So when I say "militia" in the article, I mean "we the people" as that is its proper definition by law. The militia is just the general population trained responsibly to be the last line of defense. I'm just going by the law. The thesis of the article is that there must be upper and lower bounds on what the Second Amendment applies to. The Amendment says "To preserve the security of a free State" - which shows that local crime and federal tyranny or foreign invasion are the threats that could disrupt a free state. Hence, a militia weapon is that which is appropriate both for home defense and battlefield use. For example, artillery, bombs, nuclear devices etc...are not appropriate for home defense so they are not covered by the Second Amendment. Likewise, handguns are not useful on the battlefield so they are also not covered. So the only option left is a military style non-automatic rifle. Thus, this article would upset gun-rights activists who want unlimited interpretation of the Second Amendment because it advocates the restriction and allows the banning of handguns, and it also upsets liberal and socialists who prefer there be no guns at all. I think both are in error. The current core Cass group has become very socialist in its political position. So their jumping upon the gun issue I think stems from this, which then was diverted toward the whole cult/waco idea to feed Laura's paranoia. You can tell it's paranoia because they wouldn't acknowledge my position on favoring the restriction of handguns and advocating the responsible and trained use of rifles. Here's what I said about handguns: ---- Thirty thousand deaths last year in America are aided by handguns, which are also involved in the greatest portion of gun crime. Potential criminals love them for their compactness, light weight, and easy concealment. Handguns fit in schoolbags, coat pockets, and glove compartments, and can be carried without suspicion in public. They are also readily left on the night stand for young children to blow their faces off with. The social costs for mass ownership, whether legal or illegal, of handguns is extremely high. The question is whether this social cost is outweighed by the benefit of handguns in a Militia. For home defense, handguns are excellent, and they can be carried in public to protect one's life. On the battlefield, however, handguns are not the preferred weapon of choice. Although they can be used in combat, due their shortcommings in accuracy and lethality at long range outweigh the high social cost of 30,000 dead Americans per annum? If there were no alternative to handguns, the answer would be "yes." But there are obviously weapons far better suited for a militia than a handgun, and considering the social cost, the logical conclusion would be that handguns are not a Militia weapon and are thus not guaranteed protection by the Second Amendment. ---- Then I proposed a solution: ---- .... continue regulation and restraint upon non-Militia firearms such as handguns, leisure rifles, and hunting shotguns. If the liberals wish to ban handguns, so be it, but the ban should be lifted when civillian society is once again sufficiently stable to responsibly use them. To further reduce the use of handguns in the short term and increase the ownership of assault rifles in the Militia, place a tax on non-militia weapons, then use the revenue to fund local safety and training courses, the aim being to build up the Militia similar to a level as is found in Switzerland, where every family owns a rifle and serves vigilantly in the Militia. Once the course is taken, one receives a discount funded by the tax on his or her next purchase of a certified Militia assault weapon. The effect of this policy will be a shift from the expensive ownership of handguns to the responsible ownership of assault rifles. ----- Notice that this goes entirely along with law and encourages the involvement of government, as well as seeks reduction in handguns which so many gangsters and thugs like to use. It encourages responsibility among citizens and alleviates some burden off law enforcement and the military, much like the system in Switzerland. Now, how would this attract attention from three-letter federal agencies as the Cass team claims? How would this advocate the stockpiling of weapons for a physical revolution? It wouldn't...the article is a peaceful solution to the gun issue. Guns are a last resort, but not one to be dismissed...look at Nazi germany which was disarmed before the Nazis assumed control and thus left the Jews unable to resist, and look at Iraq which the Cass team cheers on for resisting the American occupation with guns and bombs. It's hypocrisy for the Cass team to both dismiss the idea of guns and simultaneously cheer their use in Iraq because America could be no different in the future. It's better to have these available and decide not to use them, than have them banned before they're needed. And if legalized, they should be used responsibly as I wrote in the article. This article was just an idea I came up with while researching the subject for a literature class. In the way it's written, it would be benign even in the eyes of federal agencies who may instead nod at its advocacy of responsibility. The only thing the Cass team is threatened by is the illusion they created by taking selected parts out of context and ignoring the rest.=============== Lastly, a recent overview I gave to someone asking about what happened: ======== I became aware of the Cass material in late 1999 or 2000, and joined their discussion group in early 2001. In the summer of 2002 I attended the first Cassiopaean Conference held in Florida. There I met Laura and her husband and most everyone in the research group. During all that time, their philosophy, research focus, approach to channeling, etc... remained the same or else became better and more in line with the original status. But several things happened that year which resulted in the drastic changes. First, Laura was put through much stress and negativity by her battle against Vincent Bridged and Jay Weidner, and later her old acquaintance Fred Irland (often called by Frank Scott as a pseudonym in her materials). This was then coupled with repeated attacks and disruptions on her message board, some of which involved me and my stance on the organic portals material, and then a huge period of upheaval after her receiving a death threat letter where the group was told "prepare to be boarded." All of this made the group very paranoid, and they reacted by making controls on the discussion group very tight, and by using a mechanical system of responses to respond to supposed disinformation agents or attack them in return. This made them spiritually weakened, of a negative soul frequency, and therefore very vulnerable to manipulation by dark forces. Simultaneously, one member in particular single-handedly turned around the research focus of the group. He emphasized a Fourth Way school approach coupled with socialist ideology and political activism. Most of their site today is a result of that. Their fear of losing credibility also forced them to become agnostic, inflexible, and narrowminded in their research, increasingly placing their own credentials and resorting to metaphysical 'political correctness' and 'fourth way speak' to come off as rational when many times they were anything but rational. This resulted in an atrophy, mechanization, and an abandoning of their spirits and original line of research. Nowadays more energy is spent on ranting against world problems and defending their views than forging ahead with new research, and because their system is so rigid there is barely any room for fluid expansion of their minds. They get paranoid against anyone contradicting them. As for Laura herself, between 2002-2003 she went from a rational and enthusiastic researcher to a vindictive and depleted leader on a power trip. The change was quick enough, and was preceded by a very standard procedure of spiritual weakening by negative hyperdimensional forces, and her later self is so contradictory to her old self, that I can only conclude that she's either been "processed" as described in the Human Simulacra article or else thoroughly programmed. She also started isolating male members by trying to convince them that their loved ones were organic portals or else reanimated, yet persecuted people like me for daring to point the same out about others. It was total hypocrisy. Their current philosophy now about forming a magnetic center through repeated shocks that come from viewing the horrors of the world - this is an entirely upside down version of what Mouravieff and Gurdjieff taught, and is spiritual suicide... but everything taken together, including the Cass Transcripts being removed from free public access, tells me that starting 2002 the group was successfully "boarded" (boarded does not only mean being thrown overboard, but also being invaded) and subverted by 4D STS forces. Maybe there is hope for recovery, but it would require a re-evaluation of their path and philosophy and the processing of their shadow selves. Unfortunately pride and ego keeps them from admitting any wrong, so I do not hold out hope for them. My stay with them ended in late 2003 after an ugly split that even today leaves deep wounds in the many people involved. ================ That sums it up. Some of my articles over the past year were aimed at counterbalancing what I perceive to be spiritual misinformation being disseminated on their site. The QFS ideology is a provincial and skewed collage of Fourth Way / Socialist / Castaneda paradigms. My material is not perfect either, but at least I try to correct and improve the material instead of branding constructive criticism as a "matrix attack." I believe that awareness and positivity together make the best combination for spiritual progress, and that building up the magnetic center requires transmuting negative emotions into positive ones, rather than 'fusing the magnetic center through emotional shocks' which amounts to emotional self-flagellation. They are doing what is right for them, and likewise I am doing what is right for me...the rift was a matter of fate, and at present I hold no regrets or bitterness about what happened. Life goes on.